tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5344965236400432005.post6099158850340710043..comments2023-10-17T07:31:55.542-04:00Comments on Technically Uranium with Merv: Merv's Weekly Uranium Commentary 27 Nov 2011xhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05640657811772846091noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5344965236400432005.post-15320388552246857412011-11-29T08:23:08.057-05:002011-11-29T08:23:08.057-05:00Marv,
Thanks for calrifying. I mess read (freudi...Marv,<br /><br />Thanks for calrifying. I mess read (freudian slip) thinking that "spectacular" was in reference to the futhure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5344965236400432005.post-49830142158722022502011-11-28T18:42:52.976-05:002011-11-28T18:42:52.976-05:00Anonymous,
The Index measures the weekly average ...Anonymous,<br /><br />The Index measures the weekly average performance of all component stocks, that includes those that are moving lower as well as those that are moving higher. Technically, one should be only in those stocks that are moving higher and when they turn around you get out and put your capital to work into the next stock that is moving higher. You elliminate, to a great extent, the loser stocks in your trading. The performance should therefor be better than if you included the losers as the Index does.Mervnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5344965236400432005.post-31508942120506241632011-11-28T14:21:52.204-05:002011-11-28T14:21:52.204-05:00Hi Merv,
Pleaes elaborate on your comment:
"T...Hi Merv,<br />Pleaes elaborate on your comment:<br />"The net result should be even more spectacular than the Weekly Index itself would suggest."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com